<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reviews itemIdentifier="AmelieArchive">
  <review review_id="13344">
    <review_id>13344</review_id>
    <reviewbody>A very enjoyable film.. A lot of research would have been done to assemble these classic humour moments. I am requesting a sequel..Essential download for Prelinger fans.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>highly recommended</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>cashel</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2004-05-19 01:43:12</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2004-05-19 01:43:12</createdate>
    <stars>5</stars>
    <editedby>Jonathan Aizen</editedby>
  </review>
  <review review_id="13349">
    <review_id>13349</review_id>
    <reviewbody>From one of the people who's probably watched more Prelinger films than almost anyone else, a few choice moments that you might not have spotted before. Highly recommended.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Excellent highlighting of classic Prelinger moments.</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>simon c</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2004-05-19 07:27:02</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2004-05-19 07:27:02</createdate>
    <stars>5</stars>
  </review>
  <review review_id="19403">
    <review_id>19403</review_id>
    <reviewbody>Spuzz, a regular reviewer of Prelinger films, put together this short compilation of unscripted, behind-the-main-action moments from Prelinger films. These are fun moments, though they could have been edited a little bit tighter. This really makes me want to put together my own compilation films, though. It also makes me really want to check out A Visit to Santathis film looks hideous! And I love the ending!&#13;
Ratings: Camp/Humor Value: ****. Weirdness: ****. Historical Interest: ****. Overall Rating: ****.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Hey, Look Over There!</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>Christine Hennig</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2004-08-23 19:15:37</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2004-08-23 19:15:37</createdate>
    <stars>4</stars>
  </review>
  <review review_id="24372">
    <review_id>24372</review_id>
    <reviewbody>Can we have some more like this, and longer</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>More please</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>Xtra4U</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2004-11-06 05:17:34</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2004-11-06 05:17:34</createdate>
    <stars>4</stars>
  </review>
  <review review_id="32470">
    <review_id>32470</review_id>
    <reviewbody>This was obviously assembled by someone who loves classic films. Fun to watch!&#13;
&#13;
Bravo.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>There is love in this</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>Pug</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2005-02-19 09:35:19</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2005-02-19 09:35:19</createdate>
    <stars>4</stars>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>At last I know who Spuzz is, the excellent writer and unparallelled reviewer of movies in the Internet Archive. He has given me many keys to the Jam Handy movies, for example. Now I've discovered that he has created mashup movies. This one is nice and mirrors subjects often discussed in his reviews, for example the strangely treated animals in the Chevrolet Leader News. A cute movie.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>The Reviewer as Movie Maker</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>Eva Vikstrom</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2007-07-26 18:42:24</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2007-07-26 18:42:24</createdate>
    <stars>5</stars>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>although i gotta admit this is a great selection of scenes, especially the dog been thrown into the kits :) i think the whole bit in amelie was a comment on the the whole digital versus celluloid and the fact that when you film digital you loose that certain personality that is only on celluloid. &#13;
not seeing whats goin on outside...&#13;
but great stuff and keep it coming spuzz&#13;
A++</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>hah</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>kr4ft</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2008-07-05 20:02:41</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2008-07-05 20:02:41</createdate>
    <stars>4</stars>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>It seemed that the ending was 1/2 of the film.&#13;
&#13;
Some of these were editing mishaps but they were all errors in judgment.  I concur with the other reviewer in that I would like to see a sequel.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Very short editing mishaps</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>zythmer</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2009-02-02 03:19:27</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2009-02-02 03:19:27</createdate>
    <stars>4</stars>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>Really, dude, you must be *really* easily pleased.  Most of what you point out either isn't all that great, or can't be noticed.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Lot of time on your hands, eh?</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>BondoFox</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2009-02-06 01:50:24</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2009-02-06 01:50:24</createdate>
    <stars>0</stars>
  </review>
  <info>
    <num_reviews>9</num_reviews>
    <avg_rating>4.38</avg_rating>
  </info>
</reviews>
